Planning For A Future That We’ve Already Seen: Mark Raymer Constructs Dystopian D.I.Y. Narratives

Katie Hargraves discovers hopefully timeless cultural cues and science fiction as a potential

site for renewed communication in her analysis of the work of Mark Raymer

In 1992, a report was commissioned by the Sandia National Laboratories and the

Department of Energy (DOE) in the United States. This report has a particular challenge: the

DOE was developing a Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a location deep below the surface

of the earth that would store the radioactive waste leftover from developing nuclear weapons

for the cold war. Their challenge, and the reason for the report, was to highlight the danger of

the site for 200,000 years into the future—the amount of time it would take the nuclear waste

to become inert. They were planning for the fall of our civilization.

Mark Alister Raymer Hoopla, 2017 Textile, printmaking, drawing 7 ft x 5 ft

Mark Alister Raymer

Hoopla, 2017

Textile, printmaking, drawing

7 ft x 5 ft

Although less than 250 years old, the United States government constructed and continues

to uphold a narrative that this country is an enduring institution. In commissioning this report,

the DOE was acknowledging an inevitable fall. They brought together an impressive

interdisciplinary team that included linguists, anthropologists, architects, geologists, and

engineers to answer the question: How do we communicate meaning in a time when

language cannot be deciphered, when the Rosetta Stone of our era has yet to be

discovered? We are curious beings. Even the curse of the pharaohs inscribed on the

entrance of a tomb was not enough to keep explorers from opening it thousands of years

later. How then could the DOE develop an appropriate marker for WIPP that could be read

200,000 years from now?

I wonder often about the motives of science fiction. Why is it that people wanted to escape

into a fictitious future when there is so much to work through in the present. While we must

plan for reality rather than envision a dystopian future, sometimes that reality requires us to

imagine beyond what we know.

Mark Alister Raymer Untitled, 2017 Textile, printmaki ng 8 ft x 7 ft

Mark Alister Raymer

Untitled, 2017

Textile, printmaking

8 ft x 7 ft

Mark Raymer’s artworks create a fantastical science-fiction future where “wildlings” (as the

artist refers to them) scavenge the middens of a long gone society, one we might recognize

as our own. These post-apocalyptic, intersexed humanoids have evolved as the children of

men; their naked creativity is well suited to surviving in our wasteland, reusing satellites as

indiscriminately as beer cans. His mountainscapes depicted in the pieced together fabric wall

hangings are reminiscent of the concept art created for the WIPP report by architect Michael

Brill: sharp stalagmite formations that protrude from the landscape with people wandering

through them. The caption to one of Brill’s images: “We considered ourselves to be a

powerful culture…. This place is not a place of honor…nothing is valued here.” What would

these post-apocalyptic humanoids think of our world? With Raymer’s work, we get a glimpse

into how they might react, what they might value, and the potential danger therein.

In exploring Raymer’s artworks, I begin to understand science fiction. Science fiction is a

dark metaphor for our times, not escapism. His sculptural installations, prints, and fiber works

explore the act of translation: both the translation from printmaker to fiber artist, and the

translation of late-capitalist society to science-fiction future humanoids. Raymer’s work is

ultimately about narrative, each piece building upon the next. The same fabrics and imagery

are repeated, a detailed illustration of a beer can is used as a collage element in a wall

hanging and developed into a larger than life soft sculpture made of cast off scraps of fabric.

Mark Alister Raymer Burlap Beer Can Landscape (group), 2017 Textile, printmaking 12 in x 5 in x 3 in (each)

Mark Alister Raymer

Burlap Beer Can Landscape (group), 2017

Textile, printmaking

12 in x 5 in x 3 in (each)

Raymer’s materiality performs the worldview of the narratives he has created, attempting to

forget the meaning of found material he uses to construct the work. A burlap sack is used for

its tactile qualities, but stripped of its class and labor material histories. Quilts are cut apart

and collaged for their color palettes while attempting to ignore their gendered history.

Detritus, and the cultural baggage that comes along with his chosen material, is

decontextualized and expected to be experienced right alongside the preciousness of the

printed image. The material construction of the works play out this desire: the prints are

meticulous and detailed, where the fiber works are hacked together, appearing to be made

with urgency. Yet, Raymer’s work misses a richness by not engaging with the cultural

meaning of materials and their context. We only have to look to history to know there is risk

in decontextualizing material—the risk of the pharaoh’s curse and the risk of WIPP.

This essay is part of a series commissioned, in collaboration with Informality Blog, for the

exhibition YET, UNKNOWN at Paragraph Gallery (23 E 12th St, Kansas City, MO 64106)

open from July 27 through August 26, 2017. These pieces, co-edited by Melaney Mitchell

(Founder & Senior Editor of Informality Blog) and Lynnette Miranda (Curator-in-Residence at

Charlotte Street Foundation) focus on a shared goal of bringing the eyes of national writers

to the work of Kansas City-based artists.

Previous
Previous

Hidden Metaphors of the (Clay) Body in the work of Kimberly LaVonne

Next
Next

E S S A Y 2: Who Should Play the Flute, or, Who ShouldPlay the Flute?